We now know from the previous tutorials that a straight current carrying conductor produces a circular magnetic field around itself at all points along its length and that the direction of rotation of this magnetic field depends upon the direction of current flow through the conductor, the Left Hand Rule.
In the last tutorial about Electromagnetism we saw that if we bend the conductor into a single loop the current will flow in opposite directions through the loop producing a clockwise field and an anticlockwise field next to each other. The Electromagnet uses this principal by having several individual loops magnetically joined together to produce a single coil.
Electromagnets are basically coils of wire which behave like bar magnets with a distinct north and south pole when an electrical current passes through the coil. The static magnetic field produced by each individual coil loop is summed with its neighbour with the combined magnetic field concentrated like the single wire loop we looked at in the last tutorial in the centre of the coil. The resultant static magnetic field with a north pole at one end and a south pole at the other is uniform and a lot more stronger in the centre of the coil than around the exterior.
Lines of Force around an Electromagnet
The magnetic field that this produces is stretched out in a form of a bar magnet giving a distinctive north and south pole with the flux being proportional to the amount of current flowing in the coil. If additional layers of wire are wound upon the same coil with the same current flowing, the magnetic field strength will be increased.
It can be seen from this therefore that the amount of flux available in any given magnetic circuit is directly proportional to the current flowing through it and the number of turns of wire within the coil. This relationship is called Magneto Motive Force or m.m.f. and is defined as:
Magneto Motive Force is expressed as a current, I flowing through a coil of N turns. The magnetic field strength of an electromagnet is therefore determined by the ampere turns of the coil with the more turns of wire in the coil the greater will be the strength of the magnetic field.
The Magnetic Strength of the Electromagnet
We now know that were two adjacent conductors are carrying current, magnetic fields are set up according to the direction of the current flow. The resulting interaction of the two fields is such that a mechanical force is experienced by the two conductors.
When the current is flowing in the same direction (the same side of the coil) the field between the two conductors is weak causing a force of attraction as shown above. Likewise, when the current is flowing in opposite directions the field between them becomes intensified and the conductors are repelled.
The intensity of this field around the conductor is proportional to the distance from it with the strongest point being next to the conductor and progressively getting weaker further away from the conductor. In the case of a single straight conductor, the current flowing and the distance from it are factors which govern the intensity of the field.
The formula therefore for calculating the “Magnetic Field Strength”, H sometimes called “Magnetising Force” of a long straight current carrying conductor is derived from the current flowing through it and the distance from it.
Magnetic Field Strength for Electromagnets
- H – is the strength of the magnetic field in ampere-turns/metre, At/m
- N – is the number of turns of the coil
- I – is the current flowing through the coil in amps, A
- L – is the length of the coil in metres, m
Then to summarise, the strength or intensity of a coils magnetic field depends on the following factors.
- The number of turns of wire within the coil.
- The amount of current flowing in the coil.
- The type of core material.
The magnetic field strength of the electromagnet also depends upon the type of core material being used as the main purpose of the core is to concentrate the magnetic flux in a well defined and predictable path. So far only air cored (hollow) coils have been considered but the introduction of other materials into the core (the centre of the coil) has a very large controlling effect on the strength of the magnetic field.
Electromagnet using a nail
If the material is non-magnetic for example wood, for calculation purposes it can be regarded as free space as they have very low values of permeability. If however, the core material is made from a Ferromagnetic material such as iron, nickel, cobalt or any mixture of their alloys, a considerable difference in the flux density around the coil will be observed.
Ferromagnetic materials are those which can be magnetised and are usually made from soft iron, steel or various nickel alloys. The introduction of this type of material into a magnetic circuit has the effect of concentrating the magnetic flux making it more concentrated and dense and amplifies the magnetic field created by the current in the coil.
We can prove this by wrapping a coil of wire around a large soft-iron nail and connecting it to a battery as shown. This simple classroom experiment allows us to pick-up a large quantity of clips or pins and we can make the electromagnet stronger by adding more turns to the coil. This degree of intensity of the magnetic field either by a hollow air core or by introducing ferromagnetic materials into the core is called Magnetic Permeability.
Permeability of Electromagnets
If cores of different materials with the same physical dimensions are used in the electromagnet, the strength of the magnet will vary in relation to the core material being used. This variation in the magnetic strength is due to the number of flux lines passing through the central core. if the magnetic material has a high permeability then the flux lines can easily be created and pass through the central core and permeability (μ) and it is a measure of the ease by which the core can be magnetised.
The numerical constant given for the permeability of a vacuum is given as: μo = 4.π.10-7 H/m with the relative permeability of free space (a vacuum) generally given a value of one. It is this value that is used as a reference in all calculations dealing with permeability and all materials have their own specific values of permeability.
The problem with using just the permeability of different iron, steel or alloy cores is that the calculations involved can become very large so it is more convenient to define the materials by their relative permeability.
Relative Permeability, symbol μr is the product of μ (absolute permeability) and μo the permeability of free space and is given as.
Materials that have a permeability slightly less than that of free space (a vacuum) and have a weak, negative susceptibility to magnetic fields are said to be Diamagnetic in nature such as: water, copper, silver and gold. Those materials with a permeability slightly greater than that of free space and themselves are only slightly attracted by a magnetic field are said to be Paramagnetic in nature such as: gases, magnesium, and tantalum.
Electromagnet Example No1
The absolute permeability of a soft iron core is given as 80 milli-henries/m (80.10-3). Calculate the equivalent relative permeability value.
When ferromagnetic materials are used in the core the use of relative permeability to define the field strength gives a better idea of the strength of the magnetic field for the different types of materials used. For example, a vacuum and air have a relative permeability of one and for an iron core it is around 500, so we can say that the field strength of an iron core is 500 times stronger than an equivalent hollow air coil and this relationship is much easier to understand than 0.628×10-3 H/m, ( 500.4.π.10-7).
While, air may have a permeability of just one, some ferrite and permalloy materials can have a permeability of 10,000 or more. However, there are limits to the amount of magnetic field strength that can be obtained from a single coil as the core becomes heavily saturated as the magnetic flux increases and this is looked at in the next tutorial about B-H curves and Hysteresis.